An RFP shouldn’t take 2 weeks just to decide if it’s worth bidding.
Before a pharma manufacturer can respond, the team has to check route feasibility, yield risk, impurity concerns, raw material availability, reactor fit, GMP requirements, batch history, plant capacity, and margin assumptions.
Today, that knowledge is scattered across prior proposals, SOPs, batch records, supplier quotes, costing spreadsheets, and senior operator judgement.
Krux turns it into one queryable layer.
Two layers of source data. Claims cited to your knowledge base.
Draft.
Krux writes proposal copy that traces back to your data. Hover any underlined claim to see the source it came from.
Most RFP tools automate the document.
Krux automates the decision.
Two axes matter in this category: how deeply the tool understands pharma manufacturing, and how much of the RFP workflow it actually decides. Everyone else picks one side. We sit alone on both.
Trust is a list of things we refuse to do.
We don't draft without citing.
Cited sentences link to a batch record, a capacity ledger, or a codified expert. Sentences Krux cannot ground are flagged for a human before review. No “according to industry standards.”
We don't auto-submit.
Krux ends at “bid-ready.” A senior PM clicks send. The system that drafts is not the system that commits, by design.
We don't train on your IP.
Your batch records, capacity, bid bands, and expert protocols stay in your tenant. They sharpen your Knowledge Base only.
We don't replace your experts.
Senior operators codify their decision logic into Krux. Krux amplifies them. It doesn’t pretend to be them.